↓ Skip to main content

Books: Bullsh*t Jobs. The Rise of Pointless Work and What We Can Do About it: Are You A ‘Duct Taper’?

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions
Title
Books: Bullsh*t Jobs. The Rise of Pointless Work and What We Can Do About it: Are You A ‘Duct Taper’?
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, January 2022
DOI 10.3399/bjgp22x718457
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emma McKenzie-Edwards

Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,534,217
of 25,238,182 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#2,173
of 4,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#137,788
of 516,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#53
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,238,182 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 516,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.