↓ Skip to main content

Reaping the benefits of liquid handlers for high-throughput gene expression profiling in a marine model invertebrate

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Biotechnology, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Reaping the benefits of liquid handlers for high-throughput gene expression profiling in a marine model invertebrate
Published in
BMC Biotechnology, January 2024
DOI 10.1186/s12896-024-00831-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giovanni Annona, Assunta Liberti, Carla Pollastro, Antonietta Spagnuolo, Paolo Sordino, Pasquale De Luca

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#14,537,918
of 25,376,646 outputs
Outputs from BMC Biotechnology
#625
of 981 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,640
of 245,264 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Biotechnology
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,376,646 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 981 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 245,264 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them