You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
空気分級における比重選別の影響を考慮した分級評価方法—太陽光パネルセルシート粉砕物を例とした考察—
|
---|---|
Published in |
Kagaku Kogaku Ronbunshu, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.1252/kakoronbunshu.50.9 |
Authors |
Kento Izumi, Yutaro Takaya, Chiharu Tokoro |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2024.
All research outputs
#19,833,352
of 25,247,084 outputs
Outputs from Kagaku Kogaku Ronbunshu
#109
of 111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#112,190
of 174,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kagaku Kogaku Ronbunshu
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,247,084 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 111 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them