You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Expert consensus guidelines: Intravenous iron uses, formulations, administration, and management of reactions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Hematology, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1002/ajh.27220 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Layla Van Doren, Marlene Steinheiser, Kristen Boykin, Kristine J. Taylor, Monica Menendez, Michael Auerbach |
| Abstract |
Intravenous iron has become an essential component for the treatment of iron deficiency and iron deficiency anemia. Individuals administering Intravenous iron should have knowledge in intravenous iron administration, including a pre-infusion assessment to evaluate infusion reaction risks, pre- and post-infusion monitoring, identification of and management of infusion reactions, accurate documentation of these reactions, laboratory monitoring and recognition and management of treatment-emergent hypophosphatemia. This comprehensive consensus provides step-by-step guidance and tools for practitioners to promote safe delivery of intravenous iron, recognition, and management of infusion reactions and treatment-emergent hypophosphatemia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 152 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 13 | 9% |
| United States | 12 | 8% |
| Mexico | 5 | 3% |
| India | 5 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Australia | 3 | 2% |
| Pakistan | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 79 | 52% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 117 | 77% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 22 | 14% |
| Scientists | 12 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 40% |
| Researcher | 1 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 87. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#499,867
of 25,801,916 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Hematology
#43
of 3,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,501
of 350,347 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Hematology
#1
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,801,916 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,347 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.