You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Two new species of chigger mites (Trombidiformes: Trombiculidae: Blankaartia and Euschoengastia) associated with rodents from the Amargosa Valley, Mojave Desert, United States, with the redescription of Euschoengastia fasolla Brennan and Beck, 1955
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Acarology, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1080/01647954.2024.2303101 |
| Authors |
Ricardo Bassini-Silva, Risa Pesapane, Cal Welbourn, Ronald Ochoa, Janet Foley, Darci Moraes Barros-Battesti, Fernando de Castro Jacinavicius |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 67% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,661,872
of 25,269,846 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Acarology
#22
of 356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,885
of 161,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Acarology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,269,846 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 356 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,860 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them