You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Dry Needling Versus Manual Therapy for Patients With Mechanical Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, April 2024
|
DOI | 10.2519/jospt.2024.12091 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jeevan Pandya, Emilio J Puentedura, Shane Koppenhaver, Josh Cleland |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 12 | 17% |
United Kingdom | 7 | 10% |
Brazil | 4 | 6% |
Saudi Arabia | 3 | 4% |
Canada | 2 | 3% |
Germany | 2 | 3% |
Indonesia | 2 | 3% |
Portugal | 1 | 1% |
Mexico | 1 | 1% |
Other | 8 | 11% |
Unknown | 29 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 63 | 89% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 6% |
Scientists | 4 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 9 | 33% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
Other | 3 | 11% |
Unknown | 7 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unspecified | 9 | 33% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 15% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 11% |
Sports and Recreations | 2 | 7% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 7 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2024.
All research outputs
#979,860
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#354
of 2,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,396
of 247,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy
#3
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,398 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 247,601 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.