↓ Skip to main content

Antibody Elution Method for Multiple Immunohistochemistry on Primary Antibodies Raised in the Same Species and of the Same Subtype

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry, February 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 2,617)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
155 patents
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
255 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Antibody Elution Method for Multiple Immunohistochemistry on Primary Antibodies Raised in the Same Species and of the Same Subtype
Published in
Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry, February 2009
DOI 10.1369/jhc.2009.953240
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Double or multiple antigen labeling in IHC classically relies on the existence of primary antibodies raised in different species or of different IgG isotypes to ensure the specific labeling with the secondary detection systems. However, suitable pairs of primary antibodies are not always available or the best choice (e.g., as diagnostic tools). During the last few years, several methods have been proposed to overcome this, but none of them offers the flexibility needed for reliable double or multiple enzymatic or fluorescent IHC. We present here a procedure that elutes the antibodies after a first round of immunolabeling, which, in combination with precipitation-based detection systems, allows multiple IHC rounds even for primary antibodies raised in the same species and IgG isotype. Compared with other proposed methods, this procedure ensures a reliable enzymatic or fluorescent staining without cross-reactivity and without loss of tissue antigenicity, thus offering a flexible tool for colocalization studies and pathological diagnosis. This manuscript contains online supplemental material at http://www.jhc.org. Please visit this article online to view these materials.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 255 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Canada 2 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 242 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 57 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 17%
Student > Master 33 13%
Student > Bachelor 28 11%
Other 12 5%
Other 37 15%
Unknown 44 17%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 71 28%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 42 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 34 13%
Neuroscience 24 9%
Engineering 10 4%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 51 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2026.
All research outputs
#2,459,834
of 33,254,694 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry
#24
of 2,617 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,451
of 143,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry
#1
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,254,694 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,617 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.