You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Engaging the Great Circle: a qualitative study of the Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde’s mobile medication unit
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Medicine, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.1080/07853890.2024.2306492 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kim A. Hoffman, Chantell Graves, Kelly Rowe, Jennifer Worth, Kellie Pertl, James Laidler, P. Todd Korthuis, Dennis McCarty |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 43. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2024.
All research outputs
#991,478
of 25,807,758 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Medicine
#66
of 1,594 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,447
of 351,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Medicine
#1
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,807,758 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,594 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.