↓ Skip to main content

Breeding Phenology of Birds: Mechanisms Underlying Seasonal Declines in the Risk of Nest Predation

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
102 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Breeding Phenology of Birds: Mechanisms Underlying Seasonal Declines in the Risk of Nest Predation
Published in
PLOS ONE, June 2013
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0065909
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 102 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Latvia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 100 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 18%
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 4%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 21 21%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 54 53%
Environmental Science 15 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 <1%
Other 6 6%
Unknown 22 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2014.
All research outputs
#12,343,598
of 34,358,242 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#108,069
of 224,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#93,726
of 244,486 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,651
of 5,146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,358,242 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,486 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.