↓ Skip to main content

Patients’ preferences within randomised trials: systematic review and patient level meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, October 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
211 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Patients’ preferences within randomised trials: systematic review and patient level meta-analysis
Published in
British Medical Journal, October 2008
DOI 10.1136/bmj.a1864
Pubmed ID
Authors

Preference Collaborative Review Group

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 6 3%
United States 2 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 198 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 19%
Student > Master 27 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 12%
Other 20 9%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Other 40 19%
Unknown 40 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 39%
Psychology 25 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 9%
Social Sciences 9 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 3%
Other 19 9%
Unknown 49 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2018.
All research outputs
#10,192,166
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#41,282
of 75,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,486
of 149,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#97
of 180 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 75,581 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.5. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,202 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 180 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.