↓ Skip to main content

Safety of direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) prescribing: OpenSAFELY-TPP analysis of 20.5 million adults’ electronic health records

Overview of attention for article published in BJGP Open, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Safety of direct-acting oral anticoagulant (DOAC) prescribing: OpenSAFELY-TPP analysis of 20.5 million adults’ electronic health records
Published in
BJGP Open, February 2024
DOI 10.3399/bjgpo.2023.0163
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karen Homan, Rachel Seeley, Louis Fisher, Carol A Roberts, Sajida Khatri, Katie Smith, Tony Jamieson, Victoria Speed, Sebastian Bacon, Amir Mehrkar, Brian MacKenna, Ben Goldacre

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#4,892,646
of 25,601,426 outputs
Outputs from BJGP Open
#293
of 645 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,010
of 336,612 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BJGP Open
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,601,426 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 645 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,612 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.