You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A critical review of GenAI policies in higher education assessment: a call to reconsider the “originality” of students’ work
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1080/02602938.2024.2309963 |
| Authors |
Jiahui Luo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 136 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 19 | 14% |
| United States | 10 | 7% |
| Spain | 6 | 4% |
| Australia | 6 | 4% |
| Japan | 5 | 4% |
| France | 4 | 3% |
| Hong Kong | 4 | 3% |
| Ireland | 3 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 24 | 18% |
| Unknown | 52 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 81 | 60% |
| Scientists | 43 | 32% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 9 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 53 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
| Researcher | 3 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
| Professor | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 17% |
| Unknown | 29 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 8 | 15% |
| Arts and Humanities | 4 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 27 | 51% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 99. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 April 2024.
All research outputs
#441,197
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
#18
of 906 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,837
of 360,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 906 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them