↓ Skip to main content

Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the pharmacologic management of acute dental pain in adolescents, adults, and older adults A report from the American Dental Association Science and…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA), February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#35 of 2,593)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
20 news outlets
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
26 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the pharmacologic management of acute dental pain in adolescents, adults, and older adults A report from the American Dental Association Science and Research Institute, the University of Pittsburgh, and the University of Pennsylvania
Published in
Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA), February 2024
DOI 10.1016/j.adaj.2023.10.009
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alonso Carrasco-Labra, Deborah E. Polk, Olivia Urquhart, Tara Aghaloo, J. William Claytor, Vineet Dhar, Raymond A. Dionne, Lorena Espinoza, Sharon M. Gordon, Elliot V. Hersh, Alan S. Law, Brian S.-K. Li, Paul J. Schwartz, Katie J. Suda, Michael A. Turturro, Marjorie L. Wright, Tim Dawson, Anna Miroshnychenko, Sarah Pahlke, Lauren Pilcher, Michelle Shirey, Malavika Tampi, Paul A. Moore

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 10 63%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 10 63%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Unknown 4 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 175. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2024.
All research outputs
#236,473
of 25,878,862 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA)
#35
of 2,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,391
of 355,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA)
#1
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,878,862 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 355,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.