You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The nasal lymphatic route of CSF outflow: implications for neurodegenerative disease diagnosis and monitoring
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Animal Cells and Systems, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1080/19768354.2024.2307559 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jiwon Chae, Mina Choi, Juyoung Choi, Seung-Jun Yoo |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 6 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 33% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 17% |
| Researcher | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 2 | 33% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,802,220
of 25,312,451 outputs
Outputs from Animal Cells and Systems
#11
of 154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,679
of 174,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Animal Cells and Systems
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,312,451 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 154 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them