↓ Skip to main content

Anosmia: an evidence-based approach to diagnosis and management in primary care

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, February 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
Title
Anosmia: an evidence-based approach to diagnosis and management in primary care
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, February 2021
DOI 10.3399/bjgp21x715181
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter G Deutsch, Catherine Evans, Nur Wahidah Wahid, Aakash D Amlani, Aman Khanna

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Unspecified 3 9%
Student > Master 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 3%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 20 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 16%
Unspecified 3 9%
Environmental Science 2 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 18 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2024.
All research outputs
#20,607,735
of 25,321,938 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#4,204
of 4,699 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#326,151
of 427,696 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#73
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,321,938 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,699 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.0. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,696 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.