You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Variability of urban fractional vegetation cover and its driving factors in 328 cities in China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science China Earth Sciences, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11430-022-1219-2 |
| Authors |
Fei Feng, Xin Yang, Baoquan Jia, Xiaoting Li, Xianwen Li, Chengyang Xu, Kaicun Wang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 2 | 50% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 50% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 25% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 40. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,006,121
of 25,340,976 outputs
Outputs from Science China Earth Sciences
#24
of 473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,529
of 213,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science China Earth Sciences
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,340,976 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.