↓ Skip to main content

Assessing communication skills in dietetic consultations: the development of the reliable and valid DIET‐COMMS tool

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Human Nutrition & Dietetics, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Assessing communication skills in dietetic consultations: the development of the reliable and valid DIET‐COMMS tool
Published in
Journal of Human Nutrition & Dietetics, June 2013
DOI 10.1111/jhn.12136
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

There is an increasing emphasis on the development of communication skills for dietitians but few evidence-based assessment tools available. The present study aimed to develop a dietetic-specific, short, reliable and valid assessment tool for measuring communication skills in patient consultations: DIET-COMMS.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 71 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 18%
Student > Bachelor 11 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 11%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 6%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 20 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 15 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 17%
Social Sciences 8 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 6%
Psychology 4 6%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 20 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2016.
All research outputs
#9,583,622
of 34,360,889 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Human Nutrition & Dietetics
#830
of 2,007 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,968
of 241,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Human Nutrition & Dietetics
#9
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,007 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.