You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Evaluation of yield and tuber functionality in short-term cultivation of Chinese artichoke using propagated cuttings
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.1080/14620316.2024.2304559 |
Authors |
Mayu Ikemoto, Akira Yamazaki, Toru Ohnishi, Taichi Ishigami, Jin Fukumitsu, Kazuma Oike, Kiyoshi Inoue, Koichi Uegaki, Munetaka Hosokawa |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,042,436
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology
#1
of 1,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,989
of 277,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,077 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.