You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Banana fibre-chitosan-guar gum composite as an alternative wound healing material
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2024.129653 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mridusmita Barman, Sazzadur Rahman, Naresh Joshi, Neeraj Sarma, Pranami Bharadwaj, Debajit Thakur, Rajlakshmi Devi, Devasish Chowdhury, Christopher Hurren, Rangam Rajkhowa |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 22% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 22% |
| Researcher | 1 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 2 | 22% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 22% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2024.
All research outputs
#458,181
of 25,398,331 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
#17
of 7,518 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,221
of 280,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Biological Macromolecules
#1
of 219 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,398,331 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,518 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 219 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.