You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Frequency of idiopathic intracranial hypertension with ultrasound in patients with fibromyalgia: Relation with function, central sensitization, and neuropathic pain
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
APLAR Journal of Rheumatology, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1756-185x.15066 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sertaç Ketenci, Bora Uzuner, Dilek Durmuş, Murat Polat |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 10 | 32% |
| Ireland | 2 | 6% |
| Sweden | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 18 | 58% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,843,448
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from APLAR Journal of Rheumatology
#81
of 1,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,420
of 350,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age from APLAR Journal of Rheumatology
#2
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,019 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.