You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Degrees of macrophage‐facilitated healing in aneurysm occlusion devices
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part B: Applied Biomaterials, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1002/jbm.b.35385 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Del A Donehoo, Claudia A Collier, Sabrina N VandenHeuvel, Sanjana Roy, Spencer C Solberg, Shreya A Raghavan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 71% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 15 | 88% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,471,623
of 25,914,360 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part B: Applied Biomaterials
#53
of 1,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,953
of 363,875 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, Part B: Applied Biomaterials
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,914,360 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,381 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,875 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them