You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A new species Begonia ziroensis and a new record of Begonia siamensis from Arunachal Pradesh, Northeast India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
New Zealand Journal of Botany, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1080/0028825x.2023.2295439 |
| Authors |
Dipankar Borah, Momang Taram, Millo Tasser, Mark Hughes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 2 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Thailand | 1 | 5% |
| Finland | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 53% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 89% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
| Scientists | 1 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,037,696
of 25,507,011 outputs
Outputs from New Zealand Journal of Botany
#9
of 610 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,607
of 321,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from New Zealand Journal of Botany
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,507,011 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 610 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them