You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Avoiding Past Mistakes in Unethical Human Subjects Research: Moving From Artificial Intelligence Principles to Practice
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Computer, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1109/mc.2023.3327653 |
| Authors |
Kristen K. Greene, Mary F. Theofanos, Craig Watson, Anne Andrews, Eyeisha Barron |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 25% |
| Researcher | 1 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 25% |
| Philosophy | 1 | 13% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 13% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,728,568
of 25,380,459 outputs
Outputs from Computer
#63
of 2,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,266
of 209,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Computer
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,380,459 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,995 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,064 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.