You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Modelling interactions of toxicants and density dependence in wildlife populations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Ecology, August 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2664.12142 |
| Authors |
Aafke M. Schipper, Harrie W. M. Hendriks, Matthew J. Kauffman, A. Jan Hendriks, Mark A. J. Huijbregts |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 49 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 31% |
| Researcher | 15 | 28% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 20 | 37% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 30% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 14 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2013.
All research outputs
#15,421,217
of 24,542,484 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#3,567
of 3,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#115,280
of 202,541 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#46
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,542,484 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.9. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 202,541 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.