↓ Skip to main content

The GP’s role in supporting women with anal incontinence after childbirth injury

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of General Practice, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
The GP’s role in supporting women with anal incontinence after childbirth injury
Published in
British Journal of General Practice, February 2024
DOI 10.3399/bjgp.2023.0356
Pubmed ID
Authors

Abi Eccles, Joanne Parsons, Debra Bick, Michael R B Keighley, Anna Clements, Julie Cornish, Sarah Embleton, Abigail McNiven, Kate Seers, Sarah Hillman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,272,771
of 25,562,515 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#1,470
of 4,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,237
of 307,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#7
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,562,515 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.