You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Verbessert der Innovationsfonds die Versorgung? Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme zum Stand der Implementierung erfolgreicher Innovationsfondsprojekte in die Versorgungspraxis.
|
---|---|
Published in |
Das Gesundheitswesen, February 2024
|
DOI | 10.1055/a-2270-3537 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christina Lindemann, Michaela Schunk, Laura Keßler, Thomas Bierbaum, Gerhard Bukow, Michael Eichinger, Erik Farin-Glattacker, Max Geraedts, Martin Härter, Heike Heytens, Andreas Meusch, Olaf Schoffer, Neeltje van den Berg, Horst Vollmar, Milena von Kutzleben, Wolfgang Hoffmann, Jochen Schmitt |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,841,279
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Das Gesundheitswesen
#58
of 477 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,016
of 193,365 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Das Gesundheitswesen
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 477 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 193,365 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.