↓ Skip to main content

Applying the Precautionary Principle to Wireless Technology: Policy Dilemmas and Systemic Risks

Overview of attention for article published in Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Applying the Precautionary Principle to Wireless Technology: Policy Dilemmas and Systemic Risks
Published in
Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, February 2024
DOI 10.1080/00139157.2024.2293631
Authors

Paul Ben Ishai, Hillel Z. Baldwin, Linda S. Birnbaum, Tom Butler, Kent Chamberlin, Devra L. Davis, Theodora Scarato, Hugh Taylor

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,401,079
of 25,658,541 outputs
Outputs from Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development
#59
of 422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,349
of 317,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,658,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,432 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them