You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Blood–brain barrier disruption and sustained systemic inflammation in individuals with long COVID-associated cognitive impairment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Neuroscience, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41593-024-01576-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chris Greene, Ruairi Connolly, Declan Brennan, Aoife Laffan, Eoin O’Keeffe, Lilia Zaporojan, Jeffrey O’Callaghan, Bennett Thomson, Emma Connolly, Ruth Argue, James F. M. Meaney, Ignacio Martin-Loeches, Aideen Long, Cliona Ni Cheallaigh, Niall Conlon, Colin P. Doherty, Matthew Campbell |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6,259 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1048 | 17% |
| United States | 281 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 106 | 2% |
| Canada | 70 | 1% |
| Spain | 66 | 1% |
| Germany | 58 | <1% |
| Mexico | 41 | <1% |
| Australia | 39 | <1% |
| Ireland | 33 | <1% |
| Other | 351 | 6% |
| Unknown | 4166 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5875 | 94% |
| Scientists | 221 | 4% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 124 | 2% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 37 | <1% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 114 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 24% |
| Unspecified | 15 | 13% |
| Other | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 11% |
| Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 16 | 14% |
| Neuroscience | 14 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 9% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 25 | 22% |
| Unknown | 24 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5106. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 April 2024.
All research outputs
#791
of 25,807,758 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#2
of 5,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9
of 337,688 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#1
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,807,758 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 58.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,688 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.