↓ Skip to main content

Asthma and Suicidal Ideation and Behavior Among Puerto Rican Older Children and Adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Asthma and Suicidal Ideation and Behavior Among Puerto Rican Older Children and Adolescents
Published in
Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease, July 2013
DOI 10.1097/nmd.0b013e3182982ba4
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

There is growing evidence of a positive association between asthma and suicidal ideation and behavior in the general community, although information on this potential association is scarce among older children and adolescents and Puerto Ricans, groups at risk for both conditions. Data came from wave 3 of the Boricua Youth Study, a longitudinal study of youth in the Bronx and San Juan conducted from 2000 to 2004. Logistic regressions for correlated data (Generalized Estimating Equation) were conducted, with asthma predicting suicidal ideation and behavior among participants 11 years or older. After adjustment for survey design; age; sex; poverty; Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, mental disorders; cigarette smoking; and stressful life events, asthma was positively associated with suicidal ideation and behavior among the Puerto Rican older children and adolescents. Public health interventions targeting Puerto Rican older children and adolescents with asthma and future studies investigating potential biological and psychological mechanisms of association are warranted.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 84 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 14%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 27 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 21%
Psychology 13 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 5%
Unspecified 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 32 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 February 2014.
All research outputs
#24,275,229
of 34,601,305 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
#2,405
of 3,733 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#168,274
of 241,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
#20
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,601,305 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,733 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 241,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.