↓ Skip to main content

The evolution of infectious agents in relation to sex in animals and humans: brief discussions of some individual organisms

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, August 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
reddit
5 Redditors

Readers on

mendeley
73 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The evolution of infectious agents in relation to sex in animals and humans: brief discussions of some individual organisms
Published in
Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, August 2011
DOI 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06133.x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The following series of concise summaries addresses the evolution of infectious agents in relation to sex in animals and humans from the perspective of three specific questions: (1) what have we learned about the likely origin and phylogeny, up to the establishment of the infectious agent in the genital econiche, including the relative frequency of its sexual transmission; (2) what further research is needed to provide additional knowledge on some of these evolutionary aspects; and (3) what evolutionary considerations might aid in providing novel approaches to the more practical clinical and public health issues facing us currently and in the future?

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 70 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 21%
Student > Master 14 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 12%
Professor 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 5%
Other 13 18%
Unknown 11 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 10 14%
Unknown 14 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2025.
All research outputs
#5,923,639
of 32,718,554 outputs
Outputs from Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
#2,594
of 14,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,827
of 159,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
#5
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,718,554 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,976 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.