You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mapping dysfunctional circuits in the frontal cortex using deep brain stimulation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Neuroscience, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41593-024-01570-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Barbara Hollunder, Jill L. Ostrem, Ilkem Aysu Sahin, Nanditha Rajamani, Simón Oxenford, Konstantin Butenko, Clemens Neudorfer, Pablo Reinhardt, Patricia Zvarova, Mircea Polosan, Harith Akram, Matteo Vissani, Chencheng Zhang, Bomin Sun, Pavel Navratil, Martin M. Reich, Jens Volkmann, Fang-Cheng Yeh, Juan Carlos Baldermann, Till A. Dembek, Veerle Visser-Vandewalle, Eduardo Joaquim Lopes Alho, Paulo Roberto Franceschini, Pranav Nanda, Carsten Finke, Andrea A. Kühn, Darin D. Dougherty, R. Mark Richardson, Hagai Bergman, Mahlon R. DeLong, Alberto Mazzoni, Luigi M. Romito, Himanshu Tyagi, Ludvic Zrinzo, Eileen M. Joyce, Stephan Chabardes, Philip A. Starr, Ningfei Li, Andreas Horn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 359 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 77 | 21% |
| United Kingdom | 28 | 8% |
| Germany | 26 | 7% |
| Canada | 9 | 3% |
| Spain | 8 | 2% |
| France | 7 | 2% |
| Australia | 7 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 6 | 2% |
| Japan | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 48 | 13% |
| Unknown | 137 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 231 | 64% |
| Scientists | 101 | 28% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 21 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 64 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 64 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 17% |
| Unknown | 17 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 15 | 23% |
| Unspecified | 7 | 11% |
| Psychology | 7 | 11% |
| Engineering | 5 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 9 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 562. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2024.
All research outputs
#43,371
of 25,800,372 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#68
of 5,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#693
of 336,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#3
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,800,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 58.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.