You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Conspiracy, misinformation, radicalisation: understanding the online pathway to indoctrination and opportunities for intervention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Sociology, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1177/14407833241231756 |
| Authors |
Emily Booth, Jooyoung Lee, Marian-Andrei Rizoiu, Hany Farid |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 100% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 3 | 100% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2024.
All research outputs
#567,748
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Sociology
#17
of 767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,356
of 330,938 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Sociology
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,938 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them