↓ Skip to main content

Responding well to Spiritual Abuse: practice implications for counselling and psychotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#9 of 483)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
50 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Responding well to Spiritual Abuse: practice implications for counselling and psychotherapy
Published in
British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, February 2024
DOI 10.1080/03069885.2023.2283883
Authors

Lisa Oakley, Kathryn Kinmond, Peter Blundell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,070,548
of 25,656,290 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Guidance & Counselling
#9
of 483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,853
of 313,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Guidance & Counselling
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,656,290 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 483 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them