You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nutraceutical supplementation increases mobility in aged captive non‐domesticated felids
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Veterinary Record: Journal of the British Veterinary Association, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1002/vetr.3797 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Matthew Norfolk, Jon Bielby, Luiza Figueiredo Passos, Adam R. Reddon, Matthew Rendle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 9 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 35 | 76% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 46 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,108,497
of 25,893,933 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Record: Journal of the British Veterinary Association
#169
of 7,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,435
of 341,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Record: Journal of the British Veterinary Association
#3
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,893,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.