↓ Skip to main content

Global Guidelines in Dermatology Mapping Project (GUIDEMAP)—A systematic review of the methodological quality of contact dermatitis clinical practice guidelines

Overview of attention for article published in Contact Dermatitis (01051873), February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Global Guidelines in Dermatology Mapping Project (GUIDEMAP)—A systematic review of the methodological quality of contact dermatitis clinical practice guidelines
Published in
Contact Dermatitis (01051873), February 2024
DOI 10.1111/cod.14530
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esther J. van Zuuren, Bernd W. M. Arents, Sofieke Vermeulen, Jan W. Schoones, Zbys Fedorowicz

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,284,188
of 25,604,262 outputs
Outputs from Contact Dermatitis (01051873)
#650
of 2,601 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,047
of 277,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Contact Dermatitis (01051873)
#1
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,604,262 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,601 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.