↓ Skip to main content

Estimating the Total and Precaudal Lengths of the Main Shark Species from Interdorsal Measurements in the Eastern-Central Pacific Ocean

Overview of attention for article published in Thalassas: An International Journal of Marine Sciences, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 103)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Estimating the Total and Precaudal Lengths of the Main Shark Species from Interdorsal Measurements in the Eastern-Central Pacific Ocean
Published in
Thalassas: An International Journal of Marine Sciences, February 2024
DOI 10.1007/s41208-024-00674-6
Authors

Diego Mejía, Jesús Briones-Mendoza

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2024.
All research outputs
#7,149,790
of 25,403,829 outputs
Outputs from Thalassas: An International Journal of Marine Sciences
#18
of 103 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,399
of 167,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thalassas: An International Journal of Marine Sciences
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,403,829 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 103 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them