You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
White Ants: Biotic Borders to Biocultural Frontiers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Isis: Journal of the History of Science in Society, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1086/728889 |
| Authors |
Jeannie N. Shinozuka, Rohan Deb Roy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
| Mexico | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 14 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 13 | 62% |
| Scientists | 7 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,361,467
of 25,800,372 outputs
Outputs from Isis: Journal of the History of Science in Society
#92
of 2,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,084
of 332,233 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Isis: Journal of the History of Science in Society
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,800,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,142 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,233 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.