You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bacterial community assessment of drinking water and downstream distribution systems in highland localities of Ecuador
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Water & Health, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.2166/wh.2024.290 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
C. Alfonso Molina, Cristian Quiroz-Moreno, Pablo Jarrín-V., Magdalena Díaz, Elizabeth Yugsi, Jorge Pérez-Galarza, Lucy Baldeón-Rojas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ecuador | 10 | 53% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 95% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2024.
All research outputs
#2,535,361
of 25,834,578 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Water & Health
#60
of 740 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,108
of 351,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Water & Health
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,834,578 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 740 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 351,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them