You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Emerging plagiarism in peer-review evaluation reports: a tip of the iceberg?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientometrics, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11192-024-04960-1 |
| Authors |
Mikołaj Piniewski, Ivan Jarić, Demetris Koutsoyiannis, Zbigniew W. Kundzewicz |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 64 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 8% |
| Spain | 4 | 6% |
| France | 3 | 5% |
| Australia | 3 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Turkey | 2 | 3% |
| China | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 14 | 22% |
| Unknown | 22 | 34% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 31 | 48% |
| Scientists | 29 | 45% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 50% |
| Researcher | 1 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 50% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,311,264
of 25,626,416 outputs
Outputs from Scientometrics
#201
of 2,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,411
of 274,339 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientometrics
#1
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,626,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,940 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,339 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.