You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Integrative taxonomy led to recognising Clusia reginae (Clusiaceae), a new tree species from the Venezuelan Andes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Kew Bulletin, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12225-023-10150-8 |
| Authors |
Manuel Luján, Jorge Paolini-Ruiz, Elio Sanoja, Cherry A. Rojas, Francisca Ely |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 133 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 47 | 35% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Sao Tome and Principe | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 66 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 118 | 89% |
| Scientists | 11 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 105. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 May 2024.
All research outputs
#412,020
of 25,856,713 outputs
Outputs from Kew Bulletin
#5
of 1,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,212
of 337,238 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Kew Bulletin
#1
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,856,713 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,203 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,238 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.