↓ Skip to main content

Biogeography and spatio-temporal diversification of Selenidera and Andigena Toucans (Aves: Ramphastidae)

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Phylogenetics & Evolution, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
165 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Biogeography and spatio-temporal diversification of Selenidera and Andigena Toucans (Aves: Ramphastidae)
Published in
Molecular Phylogenetics & Evolution, July 2013
DOI 10.1016/j.ympev.2013.06.017
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Andean uplift, Plio-Pleistocene climatic fluctuation, and river dynamics in the Amazon basin have all been implicated in the diversification of the South American avifauna. We reconstructed phylogenetic relationships in the genus Selenidera, which has served as a classic case of putative refugial speciation, and the closely related genus Andigena, to better understand the processes driving their diversification. Using mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences, we constructed a phylogeny to estimate the pattern and timing of divergence within and between seven lowland Selenidera toucanets and the five species of Andigena mountain-toucans, which together form a single clade. All phylogenetic analyses supported the monophyly of the montane genus Andigena, but indicated that the genus Selenidera is likely paraphyletic with respect to Andigena. Our time tree analysis is consistent with the orogenic uplift of the northern Andean range having initiated the divergence between Selenidera and Andigena, and that the movement and fragmentation of montane habitats in response to Pleistocene climatic oscillations likely influenced diversification within Andigena. Estimated divergence times for lowland Amazonian Selenidera did not support the Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) refuge hypothesis as an important biogeographic factor for the diversification of lineages studied here. The timing of divergence within Selenidera is consistent with the hypothesis that geographic isolation of areas of endemism generated by Amazonian river dynamics during the Plio-Pleistocene contributed to Selenidera speciation and current species distributions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 165 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 7 4%
United States 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 153 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 19%
Student > Bachelor 25 15%
Student > Master 21 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 10%
Other 28 17%
Unknown 22 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 103 62%
Environmental Science 17 10%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 27 16%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2020.
All research outputs
#4,908,007
of 34,360,889 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Phylogenetics & Evolution
#836
of 5,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,813
of 239,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Phylogenetics & Evolution
#6
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,889 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,355 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,967 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.