↓ Skip to main content

‘I was able to make a better decision about my health.’ Wāhine experiences of colposcopy at a marae‐based health clinic: A qualitative study

Overview of attention for article published in Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, February 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
‘I was able to make a better decision about my health.’ Wāhine experiences of colposcopy at a marae‐based health clinic: A qualitative study
Published in
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, February 2024
DOI 10.1111/ajo.13803
Pubmed ID
Authors

Judy Ormandy, Simon Phillips, Maringikura Campbell, Bernie Haenga‐Melvin, Luana Phillips‐Govind, Sara Filoche

Abstract

Equitable access to colposcopy services is required if we are to realise the benefit of the introduction of human papilloma virus (HPV) screening in Aotearoa New Zealand. We piloted a community colposcopy clinic, co-located at an urban marae health clinic. To describe the experiences of wāhine (women) attending the marae-based colposcopy clinic. An in-depth reflexive thematic analysis from 34 people's accounts was undertaken. Five themes were identified from the experiences of wāhine attending the clinic. Three themes related to how having a local clinic supported access: everyone was welcoming and friendly, the environment was familiar and non-clinical and the clinic was accessible. The fourth theme related to how this contributed to agency. A fifth theme relates to wāhine views about informing the ongoing provision of colposcopy services. The experiences reflected the principles and values practised at the marae health clinic. Wāhine described feeling cared for as soon as they entered the clinic. As the clinic was local, and for some based at their marae, it was a known space where they knew the experience would be safe. Whānau were welcome with spaces for children to play. Being local meant there were fewer logistics to manage, all of which supported access. Prioritising wāhine through the provision of culturally safe and accessible colposcopy is feasible. It has the potential to contribute to the elimination of cervical cancer in Aotearoa, New Zealand.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Student > Master 1 9%
Student > Postgraduate 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 45%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 9%
Psychology 1 9%
Sports and Recreations 1 9%
Social Sciences 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2026.
All research outputs
#10,718,573
of 34,387,656 outputs
Outputs from Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#693
of 1,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,857
of 381,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,387,656 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,911 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 381,200 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.