↓ Skip to main content

Unexpected Effect of Proton Pump Inhibitors

Overview of attention for article published in Circulation, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Unexpected Effect of Proton Pump Inhibitors
Published in
Circulation, July 2013
DOI 10.1161/circulationaha.113.003602
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are gastric acid-suppressing agents widely prescribed for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Recently, several studies in patients with acute coronary syndrome have raised the concern that use of PPIs in these patients may increase their risk of major adverse cardiovascular events. The mechanism of this possible adverse effect is not known. Whether the general population might also be at risk has not been addressed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 35 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 149 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 12%
Student > Master 16 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Other 10 6%
Other 37 24%
Unknown 37 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Other 11 7%
Unknown 45 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 113. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2026.
All research outputs
#474,243
of 34,603,176 outputs
Outputs from Circulation
#1,317
of 28,487 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,838
of 240,633 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation
#10
of 181 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,603,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 28,487 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 31.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,633 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 181 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.