↓ Skip to main content

Familial Concentration of Developmental Language Impairment

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, May 1989
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 186)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Familial Concentration of Developmental Language Impairment
Published in
Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, May 1989
DOI 10.1044/jshd.5402.287
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A questionnaire concerning the history of treatment of developmental language disorder was used to evaluate the prevalence of these problems within the immediate family members of second-grade children with and without language impairment. The data obtained from these families revealed strong evidence that such language problems are not randomly distributed across families but rather tend to concentrate within families. Although all family members of the language-impaired second graders demonstrated substantially increased odds for language impairment over those who came from families with normal second graders, a considerable range of increased odds for language impairment existed among the family members. Specifically, brothers and to a lesser degree sisters had a higher familial association with language impairment than did the parents. These results suggest that the factors that contribute to developmental language disorders are at least in part associated with the family unit.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Uruguay 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Netherlands 1 2%
Hong Kong 1 2%
Unknown 52 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 20%
Professor 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 11 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 9 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 14%
Linguistics 7 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 14 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2024.
All research outputs
#7,180,680
of 33,212,904 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders
#24
of 186 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,050
of 19,890 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,212,904 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 186 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,890 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them