↓ Skip to main content

高木貞二先生を偲ぶ

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science, January 1976
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 144)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
高木貞二先生を偲ぶ
Published in
Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science, January 1976
DOI 10.4288/kisoron1954.12.4_139
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2024.
All research outputs
#8,545,995
of 25,399,318 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science
#32
of 144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,443
of 22,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the Japan Association for Philosophy of Science
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,399,318 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 144 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 22,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them