↓ Skip to main content

CMAJ

Endometrial polyps

Overview of attention for article published in Canadian Medical Association Journal, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
Title
Endometrial polyps
Published in
Canadian Medical Association Journal, March 2024
DOI 10.1503/cmaj.230716
Pubmed ID
Authors

Justin Wei-Jia Lim, Andrea Simpson, Lindsay Shirreff

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2024.
All research outputs
#6,554,546
of 25,711,998 outputs
Outputs from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#4,429
of 9,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,833
of 302,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Canadian Medical Association Journal
#43
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,711,998 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,535 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 302,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.