↓ Skip to main content

Fibromyalgia Pain and Substance P Decrease and Sleep Improves After Massage Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Rheumatology, April 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#30 of 2,415)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Fibromyalgia Pain and Substance P Decrease and Sleep Improves After Massage Therapy
Published in
Journal of Clinical Rheumatology, April 2002
DOI 10.1097/00124743-200204000-00002
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Massage therapy has been observed to be helpful in some patients with fibromyalgia. This study was designed to examine the effects of massage therapy versus relaxation therapy on sleep, substance P, and pain in fibromyalgia patients. Twenty-four adult fibromyalgia patients were assigned randomly to a massage therapy or relaxation therapy group. They received 30-minute treatments twice weekly for 5 weeks. Both groups showed a decrease in anxiety and depressed mood immediately after the first and last therapy sessions. However, across the course of the study, only the massage therapy group reported an increase in the number of sleep hours and a decrease in their sleep movements. In addition, substance P levels decreased, and the patients' physicians assigned lower disease and pain ratings and rated fewer tender points in the massage therapy group.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 126 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 17%
Student > Bachelor 19 15%
Student > Postgraduate 11 8%
Other 8 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 6%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 37 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 27%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 14%
Psychology 14 11%
Sports and Recreations 5 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 16 12%
Unknown 38 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#1,668,048
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Rheumatology
#30
of 2,415 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,868
of 179,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Rheumatology
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,415 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,409 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them