You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Randomized trial of routine versus on-demand intraoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in lung transplantation: A feasibility study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Heart & Lung Transplantation, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.healun.2024.02.1454 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Basil S Nasir, Jason Weatherald, Tim Ramsay, Marcelo Cypel, Laura Donahoe, Chris Durkin, Travis Schisler, Jayan Nagendran, Moishe Liberman, Caroline Landry, Charles Overbeek, Alex Moore, Pasquale Ferraro |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,644,689
of 25,928,676 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Heart & Lung Transplantation
#505
of 2,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,727
of 339,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Heart & Lung Transplantation
#5
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,928,676 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.