↓ Skip to main content

Experimental power comes from powerful theories — the real problem in null hypothesis testing

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Neuroscience, July 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Experimental power comes from powerful theories — the real problem in null hypothesis testing
Published in
Nature Reviews Neuroscience, July 2013
DOI 10.1038/nrn3475-c2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Norway 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 88 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 29%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Professor 6 6%
Student > Master 6 6%
Other 16 16%
Unknown 7 7%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 34 34%
Neuroscience 19 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 8%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 12 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2019.
All research outputs
#4,564,266
of 27,725,161 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Neuroscience
#1,307
of 2,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,361
of 211,845 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Neuroscience
#16
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,725,161 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,845 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 33.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 211,845 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.