You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Use of Intravenous Albumin: A Guideline from the International Collaboration for Transfusion Medicine Guidelines.
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
CHEST, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.chest.2024.02.049 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jeannie Callum, Nikolaos J. Skubas, Aarti Bathla, Homa Keshavarz, Edward G. Clark, Bram Rochwerg, Dean Fergusson, Sesmu Arbous, Seth R. Bauer, Louise China, Mark Fung, Rachel Jug, Michael Neill, Cary Paine, Katerina Pavenski, Prakesh S. Shah, Susan Robinson, Hua Shan, Zbigniew M. Szczepiorkowski, Thierry Thevenot, Bovey Wu, Simon Stanworth, Nadine Shehata, ICTMG Intravenous Albumin Guideline Group, Jerome Flores, Stéfanie Frappier, Yvette Hou, Lilly Jean-Pierre, Danny Jomaa, Monisha Kabir, Leo Kadota, Michelle Lam, David A. Ripsman, Ryan Sandarage, Emiliyan Staykov, Angelica Venes, Melissa Wan, Arwa Al Riyami, Melissa Brouwers, Jeannie Callum, James Daly, Gregory A. Denomme, Lise Estcourt, Dean Fergusson, Mark Fung, Laura Green, Andreas Greinacher, Heather Hume, Rachel Jug, Richard Kaufman, Hyungsuk Kim, Vernon Louw, Tadashi Matsushita, Michael Murphy, Joanne Pink, Susan Robinson, Cynthia So-Osman, Simon Stanworth, Zbigniew M. Szczepiorkowski, Aaron Tobian, Erica Wood |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 296 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 51 | 17% |
| Japan | 17 | 6% |
| India | 12 | 4% |
| Mexico | 9 | 3% |
| Canada | 8 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 2% |
| Colombia | 6 | 2% |
| Spain | 6 | 2% |
| Poland | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 37 | 13% |
| Unknown | 139 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 237 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 36 | 12% |
| Scientists | 22 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 31% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 13% |
| Researcher | 2 | 13% |
| Other | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 63% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 13% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 200. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2024.
All research outputs
#201,108
of 25,800,372 outputs
Outputs from CHEST
#114
of 13,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,705
of 330,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CHEST
#2
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,800,372 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,317 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.